Putting the “Science” in Science Fiction: Part I

A guest blog post by Mike Hays

The science fiction genre is hard to define. With its wide variety of sub-genres, pinning down an all-encompassing descriptor for the science fiction often turns into a “we’ll know what it is when we see it” type of thing. One of the better definitions of science fiction I have come across describes science fiction as the “literature of change”. Science drives technology and technology drives change, therefore, the “literature of change” descriptor fits almost perfectly for science fiction.

No matter which sub-genre of science fiction, it is important to have a solid foundation in science. After all, it is SCIENCE fiction. This doesn’t mean the science has to be dry, concise and 100% factual, though. That’s more for hard science; the professional, peer-reviewed journal article publishing science. A scientific foundation in sci-fi simply means the science must be solid and logical. It can be based purely on fact or totally on fictionalized science, but the science must be grounded in the logic of the story and not MacGyver science.

compliments of MacGyver Online CommunityMacGyver science? That is when the science solution appears out of thin air, like in the old television show, MacGyver. Every week, the protagonist in the show would do something like stopping the bad guy from blowing up a nuclear power plant (with 0:01 seconds left on the timer, mind you) by building an electronic manual self-destruct function override switch from a paper clip, an evergreen air freshener, duct tape, a flashlight and a bologna sandwich found in the glove box of the custodial service truck abandoned in the nuclear facility’s parking lot.

The point is, the science can be factual, it can be made up, or it can be magical. But, the science cannot be carried around in a fanny pack only to be used in times of greatest need or when no other solution is apparent. No ‘deus ex machina’ solutions, please.

Karina Fabian, author of MIND OVER MIND and the Dragon Eye, P.I. series, teaches two excellent workshops on worldbuilding, Worldbuilding 101 and Worldbuilding 201. They are good courses which help a writer plan out the fundamental workings of a story. The principles Karina presents for worldbuilding translate extremely well to the use of science in science fiction.

“Worldbuilding done right brings interest, gives context, presents an image, draws in readers, and gives your characters room to grow and limits within which to operate. Done well, you can make flight of fancy and twists in logic that people will believe and adore…Done poorly, however, it can throw your reader out of a story.”

-Karina Fabian

The golden ticket of Karina’s workshops is the list of her six rules of worldbuilding, which also adapt well to the use of science in science fiction. If we can build a successful fiction world by following these principles, we can also follow them to create a successful science-grounded fiction world.

–End of Part I–

Tune in next time for more from Mike Hays. Until then, please comment below, and share your thoughts on science fiction and its many sub-genres. Feel free to plug your favorite novels, TV shows or films. Tweet a link to this post and you’ll be entered to win a copy of Beth Revis’s ACROSS THE UNIVERSE and A MILLION SUNS. Paste a copy of your tweet below to be entered into the contest!

Thanks for reading. Part II will be posted in February. Be sure to sign up for notifications of new blog posts.

About Mike Hays

Mike Hays is a husband, a father of three, a lifelong Kansan and works as a molecular microbiologist. His debut middle grade historical fiction book, THE YOUNGER DAYS, is signed for a February 2012 release from MuseItUp Publishing. He enjoys reading in the science fiction genre and making up science fiction, mostly in short story form. Besides writing, he has been a strength and conditioning coach, a football coach, and a baseball coach. He has published three non-fiction football coaching articles, co-authored several scientific papers and is the co-inventor on two US patents. His former players hardly believe he can read anything without the aid of pictures, let alone write anything sounding halfway sensible.

Blog: www.coachhays.com
Twitter: @coachhays64
Facebook: www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Hays/154175077989090

Advertisement

Comments

  1. Definitely “right on” information in this post. Like any genre, what happens and how it happens in a sci-fi story has to come logically from the world and the characters in that world. When you can hear the crank lowering a basket of tricks that will save the day, how disappointing, right? And don’t care who the hunk (e.g. MacGyver) is doing the cranking. With any book, I want to be swept away from my time and place. I want to enter that story as a silent, but totally involved participant. Herbert did that for me in Dune, Thompson in Silent Running, Wells in Twenty Thousand Leagues . . ., and anything Asimov puts on a page is a delight.

    Look forward to Part II

  2. Regina says:

    I think that this post will tremendously helpful. I would love a shot at winning books from Beth Revis. I did tweet about it at https://twitter.com/#!/regina_linton/status/162883497890033664

  3. Michelle says:

    Science fiction is such a huge genre with many sub-genres it’s hard to tell sometimes what qualifies as true sci/fi, especially when you consider the fantasy genre which so many people confuse with sci/fi.

    Great post. I’m looking forward to the next installment!

    Michelle
    http://www.Michelle-Pickett.com

    Author of Concilium, available July 2012
    Concilium: The Departure, November 2012
    PODs, available June 2013

  4. Huh, I totally agree! Science fiction is awesome, but its gotta be the right blend- not too factual, cchttps://twitter.com/nightbookthief/status/163193401771171841

  5. Huh, I totally agree! Science fiction is awesome, but its gotta be the right blend- not too factual, coz that would be boring, but not too unbelievable too! And thanks for the giveaway- I’ve heard Beth’s books are great! :D

  6. ticklingthemuse says:

    That is so funny, I was just looking into definitions of science fiction in order to repackage my dystopian novel, which I believe does fall into the SF category as well.

  7. Bobby says:

    Great post. Science fiction is a tricky genre!

    Tweeted bout this too! https://twitter.com/#!/bobbylsuarez/status/167593760920838145

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,304 other followers